The transfer of air carrier service between airports in the same community is generally thought to have adverse economic effects on the airport losing service. This report briefly examines experience with airport relocation in four communities. Further, this experience is related to prospects for air carrier activity relocation in the Washington, D.C., Metropolitan Area.*,Abstract -- Introduction -- Scope -- Background -- Experience. Chicago ; Houston ; Kansas City ; Dallas-Fort Worth -- Implications for Washington, D.C., Area Airports -- Conclusion -- Bibliography.,John W. Fischer, Analyst in Transportation, Economic Division, with the assistance of Jose Padus, Research Assistant,CRS 84-699 E,"July 20, 1984.",SuDoc# LC 14. 18/3

Rita Ann Reimer, Legislative Attorney, American Law Division,CRS 87-325 A,"April 10, 1987.",SuDoc# LC 14. 18/3

Rita Ann Reimer, Legislative Attorney, American Law Division,CRS 84-848 A,"November 6, 1984.","Updated December 24, 1984.",SuDoc# LC 14. 18/3

Before 1980, when a disabled person's counted income exceeded the substantial gainful activity (SGA) level, his Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits were ended. This caused the loss of Medicaid benefits too in many States. Critics argued that the low SGA amount created a disincentive to work. nThe Social Security Disability Amendments of 1980, P.L. 96-265, allowed disabled SSI recipients who worked and earned more than the SGA amount to receive a special SSI benefit and thereby remain eligible for Medicaid. The 1980 amendments included a number of provisions designed to encourage disabled recipients to attempt to return to work. This paper analyzes the current rules on work-related earnings and also examines past policies.,CRS 84-825 EPW,"November 26, 1984.",SuDoc# LC 14. 18/3

Laws Implicated By Shipments of Military Materials to Iran, Raymond J. Celada, Senior Specialist. November 20, 1986, revised November 24, 1986. Covert shipments of war materials to Iran raise issues concerning the wisdom of Administration policies and the legality of the shipments and the procedures followed in making them. This report deals with the legal issues and highlights the following authorities as being immediately implicated: the Arms Export Control Act, the Foreign Assistance Act, the Export Administration Act, the National Security Act, the Hostage Act, and potentially various funding and expenditure regulations.,Introduction -- Iran, Terrorism and "Embargo" -- Funding and Conduct of Intelligence Activities -- Funding -- Hostage Act -- Conclusion.,Raymond J. Celada, Senior Specialist in American Public Law.,CRS 86-1005 A,"November 20, 1986.","Revised November 24, 1986.",SuDoc# LC 14. 18/3

CRS 85-997 An Incorrect report number written on report.,"September 9, 1985.",SuDoc# LC 14. 18/3

This paper provides background information and a discussion of the issues relating to Federal policy for the education of gifted and talented children since the late 1960s.,Introduction -- Part I: National Recognition of the Special Education Needs of Gifted and Talented Children: 1969-1974 -- Part II: Development of Federal Categorical Programs for the Education of the Gifted and Talented: 1974-1978 -- Part III: Withdrawal of Specific Federal Support for the Gifted and Talented: 1981-1983 -- Part IV: Current Legislation Issues: 1984.,Angela M. Evans, Specialist in Education, Education and Public Welfare Division.,CRS 84-640 EPW,"May 16, 1984.",SuDoc# LC 14. 18/3

David R. Siddall, Legislative Attorney, American Law Division,CRS 84-853 A,"September 13, 1984.",SuDoc# LC 14. 18/3

At the end of the last session of Congress, Congress overwhelming approved reauthorization of the Clean Water Act. President Reagan, objecting to the cost involved, vetoed the legislation. The Act was promptly reintroduced at the beginning of the 100th Congress and again overwhelming passed by both Houses of Congress, vetoed again by President Reagan, and subsequently passed by both Houses of Congress by sufficiently large margins to override the veto. This Overviews presents editorial commentary on the reauthorization of the Clean Water Act, the President's veto, and whether or not the Act should be reauthorized over President Reagan's objections.,Where Clean Water Act Funds Would Go (New York Times) -- Editorials. Atlanta Constitution [Georgia] ; (Baltimore) Sun [Maryland] ; (Bergen) Record [New Jersey] ; Birmingham News [Alabama] ; Chicago Tribune [Illinois] ; Christian Science Monitor [Massachusettes] ; (Cleveland) Plain Dealer [Ohio] ; Des Moines Register [Iowa] ; Detroit Free Press [Michigan] ; Hartford Courant [Connecticut] ; Kansas City Times [Kansas] ; (Little Rock) Arkansas Gazette ; (Long Island) Newsday [New York] ; Miami Herald [Florida] ; Minneapolis Star and Tribune [Minnestoa] ; Milwaukee Tribune [Wisconsin] ; (Nashville) Tennessean ; (New Orleans) Times-Picayune [Louisiana] ; New York Times ; Philadelphia Inquirer [Pennsylvania] ; (Portland) Oregonian ; St. Louis Pos-Dispatch [Missouri] ; Salt Lake Tribune [Utah] ; Seattle Post-Intelligencer [Washington] ; Seattle Times [Washington] ; Washington Post ; Wichita Eagle-Beacon [Kansas],This Overviews was compiled by Adrienne Grenfell. Ann Eschete was responsible for this production of the editorials; Marsha Cerny oversaw the production of the publication.,CRS 87-86 L,"January 1987.",SuDoc# LC 14. 18/3

The Price-Anderson Act creates a source of funds to cover liability resulting from a nuclear incident, and also limits liability per incident. Key elements of the Act expire August 1, 1987. This report offers side-by-side comparison of the leading reauthorization bills pending at the close of the 99th Congress.,Robert Meltz, Legislative Attorney, American Law Division,CRS 86-1013 A,"November 24, 1986.",SuDoc# LC 14. 18/3